Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ING Commercial America Building (Tijuana)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of tallest buildings in Tijuana. Courcelles 00:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ING Commercial America Building (Tijuana)

[edit]
ING Commercial America Building (Tijuana) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see enough to indicate this particular building is notable any more than other medium height buildings. It's only 14 floors and the sources don't seem to indicate anything notable about it. Shadowjams (talk) 23:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. — Logan Talk Contributions 12:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep  Criteria #1, "fails to advance an argument for deletion" (fallacious content argument and all of two clicks to do the WP:BEFORE preparation).  Or Keep as per policy at WP:ATD, "If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion."  No evidence that the page cannot be improved, etc.  Unscintillating (talk) 20:44, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You apparently aren't very familiar with the speedy keep criteria... they're located here: WP:SK. You might familiarize yourself with the 5 criteria, none of which are relevant in your already questionable statement above. Not sure what point you're trying to make, but it sure isn't policy related. Shadowjams (talk) 09:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:DEL is a policy, and I've quoted from it.  You could defeat my "absence of evidence" assertion by providing evidence that the page cannot be improved.  You have chosen not to do so, so my assertion stands.  Unscintillating (talk) 06:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Two editors have failed to find coverage of this subject. Have you looked, yourself? I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 06:23, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There's no official policy for the notability of buildings. But, if we're arguing over its architectural status, consider that it is not relatively tall compared to buildings in the world at large. This source notes that it is the 11th tallest in the country. I think that's a stretch for notability (also, ask.com is an unreliable source). The claim that it is associated with a business is also not. Finally, and most importantly, the building is definitely not covered in-depth by third-party reliable sources. A search for this building turns up zilch for me. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 04:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ING_Commercial_America_Building_(Tijuana)&oldid=1137922931"