Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heart tattoo
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 23:44, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Heart tattoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Entirely unsourced, likely original research. Any sourced material can be added to one of the many articles we already have on tattoos. ubiquity (talk) 19:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- This was originally PRODded by MusikAnimal (talk). The PROD was removed by the page's creator. ubiquity (talk) 19:37, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Article is original research. Tried to find some references for a couple of the claims regarding the different types of tattoo hearts but couldn't find anything. - Pmedema (talk) 20:46, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: per OR rationale. Vrac (talk) 21:19, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Tone is WP:NOT encyclopedic and the topic is too large and varied to really confine to a quality stub. I do apologize for the harshness of what I struck through, I didn't intend for it to be that incendiary. Nate • (chatter) 06:12, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not the place to put your terribly-written SEO spam or a fourth grade-quality essay. Nate • (chatter) 02:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Besides being original research, this sort of information would more properly belong in tattoo, where it could be split if it becomes too long. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:52, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.