| Just a couple things I'll address a wee bit ahead of time so as to not cause another mess come phase change when processing actions and such. Regarding what seemed to be a mess with the voting. Soren being the Llama he is, was kind enough to go over the votes again before I got back this morning and informed me of something I actually missed. Even with my panic edit on VC 1.1 extended as Nelson posted if I recall, within 15 seconds or so of my posting of the VC to add it to the next page. Their vote didn't follow the formatting and did not use the bold function in the first place -____- Which essentially makes a 1 vote difference that wouldn't have had any impact on what the result would have been, given the correct numbers within the VCs. Just going to call this ahead of time, but it will become active once the phase change occurs. @coromandel will be coming into the game replacing Nelsonma11355 as of D2 start. Please welcome them with a smile, rope, bullet or whatever you feel befitting of them :3 The game will continue as is, hopefully with less of a mess to deal with. Sorry for being a shitter of a host. |
| TIME! No more actions accepted as of now, processing actions. |
LambtronMar 17, 2016 8:16 PM
| A no death is always good strange so in my view they are 4 possiblities of why this happened mafia were just not active i wish it was this one because than we could get a easy win by lynching inactives. One of the two RBs did thier job well this is possible but would be high chance we can find a mafia if the RB tells us who they blocked in this one but that is high risk and should not be done so early. Our jack of all trades used one of his possible skills like doctor to save onesome again this one is possible it is good but the worst option out of the 4 because we gain little info from it. Finally they attacked a bulletproof role if it is this one it is highly likely mafia will try to make us lynch this person to get them out of mafia' way which could be good because if anyone is going to have bulletproof it would be the arsonist or the exe so we could kill 2 birds with one stone with this one. We may also have some info off other power roles so I'm going to wait for others to post first before I vote or do anything more. |
 |
Jackrito said: A no death is always good strange so in my view they are 4 possiblities of why this happened mafia were just not active i wish it was this one because than we could get a easy win by lynching inactives. One of the two RBs did thier job well this is possible but would be high chance we can find a mafia if the RB tells us who they blocked in this one but that is high risk and should not be done so early. Our jack of all trades used one of his possible skills like doctor to save onesome again this one is possible it is good but the worst option out of the 4 because we gain little info from it. Finally they attacked a bulletproof role if it is this one it is highly likely mafia will try to make us lynch this person to get them out of mafia' way which could be good because if anyone is going to have bulletproof it would be the arsonist or the exe so we could kill 2 birds with one stone with this one. We may also have some info off other power roles so I'm going to wait for others to post first before I vote or do anything more. Then how about rather than asking roleblocker to say who he blocked why dont we ask people to tell if they were blocked. Afterall nomatter your role you always get a message saying that you were blocked. If all the people who were blocked last night says it we can narrow down the suspects and if someone who was blocked does not talk the blocker can tell the name saying this person has not claimed so it mist be mafia. On another thought if a role is bulletproof i would say ot is arsonist since it is the role closest to sk right now. |
 |
_Claire_ said: Xiaraith said: Doesn't it strike you that Iss never seemed to be bothered by the train against him, not providing anything greater overall, his votes on both Soul and indi appearing like revenge and tit for tat? Perhaps that's not telling you a lot, but the lynch definitely wasn't a random build up. Nelson voting on Iss instead of Soul seems to be a mistake indeed. Wouldn't it have been a tie with the correct standings? most people who have played a lot of mafia games should probably understand that they have to be calm when they get voted, especially if they are mafia. The more they seem flustered or annoyed with the votes, the more scummy he looks. They will probably just chill, and try his best to not get lynched. Not exactly. If you're town, it's basically your job to defend yourself from votes and direct everyone else at the correct person, so you have to put up a fight. Like, half the game is figuring out who the scum are, the rest is convincing everyone you're right. |
| "If you look for a ghost, you'll find one." |
Kasai said: This seems counterproductive since if the mafias were roleblocked last night, resulting to no death, the one who got blocked would never step up xDDThen how about rather than asking roleblocker to say who he blocked why dont we ask people to tell if they were blocked. Afterall nomatter your role you always get a message saying that you were blocked. If all the people who were blocked last night says it we can narrow down the suspects and if someone who was blocked does not talk the blocker can tell the name saying this person has not claimed so it mist be mafia. On another thought if a role is bulletproof i would say ot is arsonist since it is the role closest to sk right now. |
| I dunno mayne, if it looks like a vote, I count it as a vote. Case closed. You do you though. You do you. |
| "If you look for a ghost, you'll find one." |
DenjaX said: Kasai said: This seems counterproductive since if the mafias were roleblocked last night, resulting to no death, the one who got blocked would never step up xDDThen how about rather than asking roleblocker to say who he blocked why dont we ask people to tell if they were blocked. Afterall nomatter your role you always get a message saying that you were blocked. If all the people who were blocked last night says it we can narrow down the suspects and if someone who was blocked does not talk the blocker can tell the name saying this person has not claimed so it mist be mafia. On another thought if a role is bulletproof i would say ot is arsonist since it is the role closest to sk right now. Havent i given a solution for that? If the player does not then the blocker would say the name. If the blocked player does not talk at all (only appliciable if the blocjed player was active last phase) then the blocker would give the name near the end phase or if the player has posted here but have not step up knowing this plan. And jack would protect him at night if jack hasnt used the doc card yet. That would be up to jack though and knowing this mafia would be in a dilemma since they could potentially lose another kill |
|
Kasai said: Sounds like a good plan. I can agree with that.Havent i given a solution for that? If the player does not then the blocker would say the name. If the blocked player does not talk at all (only appliciable if the blocjed player was active last phase) then the blocker would give the name near the end phase or if the player has posted here but have not step up knowing this plan. And jack would protect him at night if jack hasnt used the doc card yet. That would be up to jack though and knowing this mafia would be in a dilemma since they could potentially lose another kill Btw, there is also a possibility that the mafias targeted the Hider so their night kill must have missed. It's possible to work that way right? |
| What if you didn't get notified whether you got rb'ed or not because didn't use any ability .. |
 |
DenjaX said: Kasai said: Sounds like a good plan. I can agree with that.Havent i given a solution for that? If the player does not then the blocker would say the name. If the blocked player does not talk at all (only appliciable if the blocjed player was active last phase) then the blocker would give the name near the end phase or if the player has posted here but have not step up knowing this plan. And jack would protect him at night if jack hasnt used the doc card yet. That would be up to jack though and knowing this mafia would be in a dilemma since they could potentially lose another kill Btw, there is also a possibility that the mafias targeted the Hider so their night kill must have missed. It's possible to work that way right? Yeah it is. That is why who was blocked is important. Meaning is it somebody we already suspect? |
|
Karote said: What if you didn't get notified whether you got rb'ed or not because didn't use any ability .. As long as i know you get notified as long as you are blocked it does not matter if you used an ability or not. It has always been this way in my other games. If lamb-san did not change it, it should be the same here too. |
|
Kasai said: Jackrito said: A no death is always good strange so in my view they are 4 possiblities of why this happened mafia were just not active i wish it was this one because than we could get a easy win by lynching inactives. One of the two RBs did thier job well this is possible but would be high chance we can find a mafia if the RB tells us who they blocked in this one but that is high risk and should not be done so early. Our jack of all trades used one of his possible skills like doctor to save onesome again this one is possible it is good but the worst option out of the 4 because we gain little info from it. Finally they attacked a bulletproof role if it is this one it is highly likely mafia will try to make us lynch this person to get them out of mafia' way which could be good because if anyone is going to have bulletproof it would be the arsonist or the exe so we could kill 2 birds with one stone with this one. We may also have some info off other power roles so I'm going to wait for others to post first before I vote or do anything more. Then how about rather than asking roleblocker to say who he blocked why dont we ask people to tell if they were blocked. Afterall nomatter your role you always get a message saying that you were blocked. If all the people who were blocked last night says it we can narrow down the suspects and if someone who was blocked does not talk the blocker can tell the name saying this person has not claimed so it mist be mafia. On another thought if a role is bulletproof i would say ot is arsonist since it is the role closest to sk right now. That is not always true if the hider was blocked for example it would not effect them because behind someone else. Also a chance that RB did not block last night But it is still a better idea than them claiming I agree. The arsonist is most likely for me as well but in some games exe are as well. |
|
Jackrito said: Kasai said: Then how about rather than asking roleblocker to say who he blocked why dont we ask people to tell if they were blocked. Afterall nomatter your role you always get a message saying that you were blocked. If all the people who were blocked last night says it we can narrow down the suspects and if someone who was blocked does not talk the blocker can tell the name saying this person has not claimed so it mist be mafia. On another thought if a role is bulletproof i would say ot is arsonist since it is the role closest to sk right now. That is not always true if the hider was blocked for example it would not effect them because behind someone else. Also a chance that RB did not block last night But it is still a better idea than them claiming I agree. The arsonist is most likely for me as well but in some games exe are as well. Well in the hider case then it would be the blocker who would get a message saying it failed though. |
|
Kasai said: Jackrito said: A no death is always good strange so in my view they are 4 possiblities of why this happened mafia were just not active i wish it was this one because than we could get a easy win by lynching inactives. One of the two RBs did thier job well this is possible but would be high chance we can find a mafia if the RB tells us who they blocked in this one but that is high risk and should not be done so early. Our jack of all trades used one of his possible skills like doctor to save onesome again this one is possible it is good but the worst option out of the 4 because we gain little info from it. Finally they attacked a bulletproof role if it is this one it is highly likely mafia will try to make us lynch this person to get them out of mafia' way which could be good because if anyone is going to have bulletproof it would be the arsonist or the exe so we could kill 2 birds with one stone with this one. We may also have some info off other power roles so I'm going to wait for others to post first before I vote or do anything more. Then how about rather than asking roleblocker to say who he blocked why dont we ask people to tell if they were blocked. Afterall nomatter your role you always get a message saying that you were blocked. If all the people who were blocked last night says it we can narrow down the suspects and if someone who was blocked does not talk the blocker can tell the name saying this person has not claimed so it mist be mafia. On another thought if a role is bulletproof i would say ot is arsonist since it is the role closest to sk right now. Let's be real here, even if the roleblocker chose correctly, they aren't going to reveal themselves right off the bat. If anything, they're going to push their target hard, and hope people are able to see what's up, (they'll be studying their targets hard as well). You're making a lot of assumptions by a) being deadset that scum were roleblocked, and b) thinking scum will lie, but what if they don't? How will you read them scummy for that? Really, too many factors are in play, including two, not one, town roleblockers, that will pretty much nullify this plan if both of their targets claimed to be roleblocked. Like, I'm a fan of process of elimination, but I don't even think that plan would work. Way too many variables, not mention ~hidden abilities~ in play, of which we know nothing about. |
| "If you look for a ghost, you'll find one." |
| Almost forgot, NKA is usually wine. |
| "If you look for a ghost, you'll find one." |
| @Coromandel. Sorry to say, your slot is pretty much void atm. You should really say something that's anything. |
| "If you look for a ghost, you'll find one." |
I swear your forum picture is so cute omgg >< Jackrito said: Kasai said: Then how about rather than asking roleblocker to say who he blocked why dont we ask people to tell if they were blocked. Afterall nomatter your role you always get a message saying that you were blocked. If all the people who were blocked last night says it we can narrow down the suspects and if someone who was blocked does not talk the blocker can tell the name saying this person has not claimed so it mist be mafia. On another thought if a role is bulletproof i would say ot is arsonist since it is the role closest to sk right now. That is not always true if the hider was blocked for example it would not effect them because behind someone else. Also a chance that RB did not block last night But it is still a better idea than them claiming I agree. The arsonist is most likely for me as well but in some games exe are as well. I don't think the person roleblocked will always be notified if he is roleblocked or not and by claiming who roleblock who is not a wisechoice.. One qtn, from 2 mafias alive both of them can come to an agreement who to lynch or only one person decides who he wants to vote? If both of them are voting for who gets killed that means we need 2 roleblockers to roleblock both of them? Please correct if I am wrong. |
 |
| Oh shit, kind of forgot to ask along side the phase change, but do people want a 48hr day phase for this one as well? I think I've seen some for it, but no-one against it... unless of-course I'm blind. For the time being I'll just go make a timer set for the 48hr period and shorten it if I see enough complaints regarding this. Sorry about that. @_Claire_ Yeah, there's no way in hell town would be required to simultaneously block 2 exact targets to stop a kill going through. If that's what you were asking. That would just be insane, even for a bastard game. |
| Yes, very much so, please. 48 hours to work out this game and nail more scum. |
| "If you look for a ghost, you'll find one." |
It also works better for me I think, I'll be out again for idk how much of the weekend. Edit: Vote count 0.0 Aint nobody votin' yet Sorry, couldn't resist.... probably getting ready and leaving in not too long from now. |
| no deaths thats a good thing tho very odd w/o a doctor not as much activity as asu had hoped for asu hopes theres more info to go on a bit later on a question for the GM assuming the cop is sane does the arsonist show up as scum or town |
kg-san said: Asu you're still a fragile flower... But its ok cause you're a beautiful flower! 花火花火花火 :D:D:D |
Flopsy said: Oh shit, kind of forgot to ask along side the phase change, but do people want a 48hr day phase for this one as well? I think I've seen some for it, but no-one against it... unless of-course I'm blind. For the time being I'll just go make a timer set for the 48hr period and shorten it if I see enough complaints regarding this. Sorry about that. @_Claire_ Yeah, there's no way in hell town would be required to simultaneously block 2 exact targets to stop a kill going through. If that's what you were asking. That would just be insane, even for a bastard game. Oh so you mean if a roleblocker roleblocks a mafia (whoever he is) then whoever they vote wont die? |
|
_Claire_ said: the mafias choose which mafias member is goin to makes the killsFlopsy said: Oh shit, kind of forgot to ask along side the phase change, but do people want a 48hr day phase for this one as well? I think I've seen some for it, but no-one against it... unless of-course I'm blind. For the time being I'll just go make a timer set for the 48hr period and shorten it if I see enough complaints regarding this. Sorry about that. @_Claire_ Yeah, there's no way in hell town would be required to simultaneously block 2 exact targets to stop a kill going through. If that's what you were asking. That would just be insane, even for a bastard game. Oh so you mean if a roleblocker roleblocks a mafia (whoever he is) then whoever they vote wont die? if the roleblocker roleblocks the chosen mafias member then the kills is blocked :D:D:D |
kg-san said: Asu you're still a fragile flower... But its ok cause you're a beautiful flower! 花火花火花火 :D:D:D |
Asunyan said: _Claire_ said: the mafias choose which mafias member is goin to makes the killsOh so you mean if a roleblocker roleblocks a mafia (whoever he is) then whoever they vote wont die? if the roleblocker roleblocks the chosen mafias member then the kills is blocked :D:D:D Why are you so cutin talking omg.. The way you call yourself Asu, >< But anyway I haven't been able to catch stuffs. I guess I will focus on people who avoid Dr_iss in Day 1 |
|
_Claire_ said: Kasai, I feel like you are not as aggresive as I thought you would be if you are a townie.. heeehh~ What's your read on Kasai as of this moment? |
| "If you look for a ghost, you'll find one." |
Asunyan said: _Claire_ said: the mafias choose which mafias member is goin to makes the killsOh so you mean if a roleblocker roleblocks a mafia (whoever he is) then whoever they vote wont die? if the roleblocker roleblocks the chosen mafias member then the kills is blocked :D:D:D Yeahrp, pretty much this. Only the specific person performing the kill needs to be role-blocked. |
| There are two cops in this game, and I'm really hoping at least one of them checked or checks Asu soon because I'm really close to voting him for doing absolutely nothing while somehow still being active in the game. |
| "If you look for a ghost, you'll find one." |
Asunyan said: no deaths thats a good thing tho very odd w/o a doctor not as much activity as asu had hoped for asu hopes theres more info to go on a bit later on a question for the GM assuming the cop is sane does the arsonist show up as scum or town That depends on what you're assuming the arsonist is. |
| Wait a sec, since there are two cops in this game, wouldn't that create cop v cop wifom? The other cop could be thinking that the other cop would check said individual when really it's the same for both. However, if both the cops ended up checking the exact same person on a given night, and if both claimed later, they could confirm that their sanities are accurate just by that one check. Said target would need to flip of course. |
| "If you look for a ghost, you'll find one." |
LucianRoy said: _Claire_ said: Kasai, I feel like you are not as aggresive as I thought you would be if you are a townie.. heeehh~ What's your read on Kasai as of this moment? Kasai looks very much like how he plays, a bit defensive and looks antitownish (he plays like me I think. except he doesn't play recklessly). Need more on him, so far I think he is neutral. I will try to make a list of people and what I think but not now---- I shall kill my demonstrator for choosing me to present in my first lab of uni. |
|
LucianRoy said: they could always check the innocent girlsWait a sec, since there are two cops in this game, wouldn't that create cop v cop wifom? The other cop could be thinking that the other cop would check said individual when really it's the same for both. However, if both the cops ended up checking the exact same person on a given night, and if both claimed later, they could confirm that their sanities are accurate just by that one check. Said target would need to flip of course. the actual alignment is already known so its an effective method to check sanities |
kg-san said: Asu you're still a fragile flower... But its ok cause you're a beautiful flower! 花火花火花火 :D:D:D |
| That would be a waste of a perfectly good check though. |
| "If you look for a ghost, you'll find one." |
SoulEaterQUEEN said: Xiaraith said: Oh, what do I see already? Soul starting a train on Iss for nothing more than grudge (?) reasons, and Lucian even following it. Lucian, are you still comfortable with this vote of yours? hmmm didn't mean to start a train. looking at it now. Lucian had a reason at this time though because he felt Iss and I were scummy, but he wasn't satisfied with Iss answer since he didn't give a deeper reason on my vote for me. won't defend myself in this position because I didn't have a deep reason, and I let my vote on him stay for 12 hours when it wasn't even helpful .. but reading if Iss responded on the train. Well, that isn't exactly correct to begin with. Both of what you did was scummy, and now that Iss has flipped, I'm even more incredulous about you guys parking those early votes. However, your preservation vote on Iss is what's throwing me for a loop atm because it really doesn't look like any bus I'd expect coming from scum. Still, do you have any conclusions from the Iss train? Any at all? This is why my reads are muddled. |
| "If you look for a ghost, you'll find one." |
LucianRoy said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: hmmm didn't mean to start a train. looking at it now. Lucian had a reason at this time though because he felt Iss and I were scummy, but he wasn't satisfied with Iss answer since he didn't give a deeper reason on my vote for me. won't defend myself in this position because I didn't have a deep reason, and I let my vote on him stay for 12 hours when it wasn't even helpful .. but reading if Iss responded on the train. Well, that isn't exactly correct to begin with. Both of what you did was scummy, and now that Iss has flipped, I'm even more incredulous about you guys parking those early votes. However, your preservation vote on Iss is what's throwing me for a loop atm because it really doesn't look like any bus I'd expect coming from scum. Still, do you have any conclusions from the Iss train? Any at all? This is why my reads are muddled. Now looking at Iss's role I am pretty sure Queen and indipindy are at least townies/3rd role. I think it is pretty risky for them to vote the other mafias, especially because it can lead to a train. But I remember queen saying sth like she would rather vote againt her mafia friend rather than be found out that she is a mafia.. :/ |
|
LucianRoy said: Kasai said: Then how about rather than asking roleblocker to say who he blocked why dont we ask people to tell if they were blocked. Afterall nomatter your role you always get a message saying that you were blocked. If all the people who were blocked last night says it we can narrow down the suspects and if someone who was blocked does not talk the blocker can tell the name saying this person has not claimed so it mist be mafia. On another thought if a role is bulletproof i would say ot is arsonist since it is the role closest to sk right now. Let's be real here, even if the roleblocker chose correctly, they aren't going to reveal themselves right off the bat. If anything, they're going to push their target hard, and hope people are able to see what's up, (they'll be studying their targets hard as well). You're making a lot of assumptions by a) being deadset that scum were roleblocked, and b) thinking scum will lie, but what if they don't? How will you read them scummy for that? Really, too many factors are in play, including two, not one, town roleblockers, that will pretty much nullify this plan if both of their targets claimed to be roleblocked. Like, I'm a fan of process of elimination, but I don't even think that plan would work. Way too many variables, not mention ~hidden abilities~ in play, of which we know nothing about. Well i do not want the rber to talk i want roleblocked to the step up. If they are not scum why would they feel the need to not say it. It would not be claiming or anything and if we think the ones who were blocked are not scummy enough to lynch the cop could always check them at night to see if they are really town. Yes as you said this plan has too many variables but if we play our cards right and if we are pucky we can catch a scum |
|
_Claire_ said: LucianRoy said: Well, that isn't exactly correct to begin with. Both of what you did was scummy, and now that Iss has flipped, I'm even more incredulous about you guys parking those early votes. However, your preservation vote on Iss is what's throwing me for a loop atm because it really doesn't look like any bus I'd expect coming from scum. Still, do you have any conclusions from the Iss train? Any at all? This is why my reads are muddled. Now looking at Iss's role I am pretty sure Queen and indipindy are at least townies/3rd role. I think it is pretty risky for them to vote the other mafias, especially because it can lead to a train. But I remember queen saying sth like she would rather vote againt her mafia friend rather than be found out that she is a mafia.. :/ Like, indi riding that RVS vote all the way to completion is crazy to me, but you might be right... |
| "If you look for a ghost, you'll find one." |
Kasai said: LucianRoy said: Let's be real here, even if the roleblocker chose correctly, they aren't going to reveal themselves right off the bat. If anything, they're going to push their target hard, and hope people are able to see what's up, (they'll be studying their targets hard as well). You're making a lot of assumptions by a) being deadset that scum were roleblocked, and b) thinking scum will lie, but what if they don't? How will you read them scummy for that? Really, too many factors are in play, including two, not one, town roleblockers, that will pretty much nullify this plan if both of their targets claimed to be roleblocked. Like, I'm a fan of process of elimination, but I don't even think that plan would work. Way too many variables, not mention ~hidden abilities~ in play, of which we know nothing about. Well i do not want the rber to talk i want roleblocked to the step up. If they are not scum why would they feel the need to not say it. It would not be claiming or anything and if we think the ones who were blocked are not scummy enough to lynch the cop could always check them at night to see if they are really town. Yes as you said this plan has too many variables but if we play our cards right and if we are pucky we can catch a scum Roy, what makes you think both the roleblockers use their roleblocking ability? See, I presume that since the roleblockers have ~hidden~ in it, they are probably not additional ability but the limitation of the ability. It is possible that only one person uses the roleblocking. We will see how it goes.. I am pretty sure whoever is the roleblocker(s) will do their best to target the person they roleblocked yesterday night Plus Kasai, correct me if I am wrong but why would the one roleblocked step up? it is the death of him. |
|
LucianRoy said: _Claire_ said: Now looking at Iss's role I am pretty sure Queen and indipindy are at least townies/3rd role. I think it is pretty risky for them to vote the other mafias, especially because it can lead to a train. But I remember queen saying sth like she would rather vote againt her mafia friend rather than be found out that she is a mafia.. :/ Like, indi riding that RVS vote all the way to completion is crazy to me, but you might be right... so far I am sure 99% that indi is a townie, if not 3rd role. There is no way that a mafia will lead the train of her fellow mafia. Queen is sort of.. townish as well after she seconded the vote and yours followed up. So far you three are at least townish, I should say. |
|
_Claire_ said: Kasai said: Well i do not want the rber to talk i want roleblocked to the step up. If they are not scum why would they feel the need to not say it. It would not be claiming or anything and if we think the ones who were blocked are not scummy enough to lynch the cop could always check them at night to see if they are really town. Yes as you said this plan has too many variables but if we play our cards right and if we are pucky we can catch a scum Roy, what makes you think both the roleblockers use their roleblocking ability? See, I presume that since the roleblockers have ~hidden~ in it, they are probably not additional ability but the limitation of the ability. It is possible that only one person uses the roleblocking. We will see how it goes... Seems like the best night to use it with all these actions flying around, lol. Like, if I were rb, you can bet I blocked someone last night both to test the waters and test any sus I might have. But this discussion is getting really wifomy because we can't predict what the rbs will do, however, what makes you think the Rbs have a limited hidden? In any event, I see no reason why the rbs shouldn't have targeted someone last night. |
| "If you look for a ghost, you'll find one." |
| What's the plan? |
LucianRoy said: _Claire_ said: Roy, what makes you think both the roleblockers use their roleblocking ability? See, I presume that since the roleblockers have ~hidden~ in it, they are probably not additional ability but the limitation of the ability. It is possible that only one person uses the roleblocking. We will see how it goes... Seems like the best night to use it with all these actions flying around, lol. Like, if I were rb, you can bet I blocked someone last night both to test the waters and test any sus I might have. But this discussion is getting really wifomy because we can't predict what the rbs will do, however, what makes you think the Rbs have a limited hidden? In any event, I see no reason why the rbs shouldn't have targeted someone last night. I don't see a reason why the roleblockers should roleblock someone yesterday. It is just an assumption, of course. WurstPanda said: What's the plan? How about you being more active XD |
|
| I've been here since the start. Watchu mean. |
_Claire_ said: Kasai said: Well i do not want the rber to talk i want roleblocked to the step up. If they are not scum why would they feel the need to not say it. It would not be claiming or anything and if we think the ones who were blocked are not scummy enough to lynch the cop could always check them at night to see if they are really town. Yes as you said this plan has too many variables but if we play our cards right and if we are pucky we can catch a scum Roy, what makes you think both the roleblockers use their roleblocking ability? See, I presume that since the roleblockers have ~hidden~ in it, they are probably not additional ability but the limitation of the ability. It is possible that only one person uses the roleblocking. We will see how it goes.. I am pretty sure whoever is the roleblocker(s) will do their best to target the person they roleblocked yesterday night Plus Kasai, correct me if I am wrong but why would the one roleblocked step up? it is the death of him. If the blocked is town why should he be afraid. They can prove their innocence |
|
Kasai said: _Claire_ said: Roy, what makes you think both the roleblockers use their roleblocking ability? See, I presume that since the roleblockers have ~hidden~ in it, they are probably not additional ability but the limitation of the ability. It is possible that only one person uses the roleblocking. We will see how it goes.. I am pretty sure whoever is the roleblocker(s) will do their best to target the person they roleblocked yesterday night Plus Kasai, correct me if I am wrong but why would the one roleblocked step up? it is the death of him. If the blocked is town why should he be afraid. They can prove their innocence Not after the one roleblocked has a high chance of being a mafia. Who will step up after that? Even if he is a townie, he will not step up, he will be scared that he will not be believed. 3rd party will never step up either, neither will mafias. I cant see how this will work. |
|
LucianRoy said: @Coromandel. Sorry to say, your slot is pretty much void atm. You should really say something that's anything. I haven't read everything yet, and I'm about to leave now. >.< But I'll be back in a few hours. |
| Alright boys, we back. Time to bash baddie skulls, reading for awhile, I'll be around if anyone wants to yell things at me. |
 |
More topics from this board
» [GAME] Last Letter Game ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )grave_robber - Sep 9, 2014 |
8752 |
by Aswin_Ash
»»
Jan 23, 11:52 AM |
|
» Chat Thread ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Fo - Jul 10, 2014 |
3741 |
by Jackrito
»»
Jan 11, 3:55 PM |
|
» Count To 7777 V3 ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Lambtron - May 15, 2018 |
1161 |
by Jackrito
»»
Jan 9, 8:12 AM |
|
» [GAME] (*￣･￣)ﾉ Count to 30 Before a Slightly Inebriated Staff Member Posts! v4 ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Togs - Jul 2, 2017 |
2870 |
by Jackrito
»»
Jan 8, 11:22 AM |
|
» [GAME] (*￣･￣)ﾉ Count to 30 Before a Slightly Inebriated MEMBER Posts! v1 ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )SoulEaterQUEEN - Mar 26, 2016 |
1990 |
by Serafos
»»
Aug 17, 2024 9:42 PM |